# Where heritage is losing

> Hillingdon has fifteen times as many at-risk entries as Bexley.

- Category: Housing
- Cadence: monthly
- Status: Published on a monthly cadence.
- Dataset key: `heritage-at-risk`
- Source: [MHCLG](https://www.planning.data.gov.uk/)
- Licence: Open Government Licence v3.0 — [terms](https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/)
- Canonical page: [https://londongraph.com/g/where-heritage-is-losing](https://londongraph.com/g/where-heritage-is-losing)
- Machine-readable record: [https://londongraph.com/data/where-heritage-is-losing](https://londongraph.com/data/where-heritage-is-losing)

## Methodology

Heritage at Risk entries per borough. Not a like-for-like comparison of neglect: a borough with more designated places has more that can be at risk, so this tracks the size of the protected stock as well as its condition. Read it alongside the listed-buildings-per-borough chart rather than on its own.

## Visualisations

- [Overview](https://londongraph.com/g/where-heritage-is-losing): Hillingdon has fifteen times as many at-risk entries as Bexley.
- [Distribution](https://londongraph.com/g/where-heritage-is-losing?view=distribution): Show every published value around the median and quartiles.

## Citation guidance

Attribute the original publisher named above and identify LondonGraph as the visualisation and methodology layer. Do not describe live values as a historical census, and do not present placeholder values as observations.
